2010 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1970 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Datsun 240Z (151 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Nissan X-Trail. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1970 Datsun 240Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Nissan X-Trail | 1970 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | Nissan | Datsun |
| Model | X-Trail | 240Z |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1970 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 151 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
