2010 Peugeot 3008 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Peugeot 3008. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Peugeot 3008 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 3008. (148 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 3008.
Because 2010 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (681 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 3008. (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 3008.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Peugeot 3008 | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Peugeot | Jaguar |
Model | 3008 | XK |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 681 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.8 seconds | 4.4 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4365 mm | 4794 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1837 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1639 mm | 1322 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2613 mm | 2752 mm |