2010 Peugeot 5008 vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1994 Mazda Midge. (104 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 5008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge. 1994 Mazda Midge has automatic transmission and 2010 Peugeot 5008 has manual transmission. 2010 Peugeot 5008 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Mazda Midge will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Peugeot 5008 | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Peugeot | Mazda |
Model | 5008 | Midge |
Year Released | 2010 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1835 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |