2010 Peugeot 807 vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Peugeot 807. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Peugeot 807 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 807. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 807.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 807 (371 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C30. (320 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 807 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Peugeot 807 | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 807 | C30 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2179 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 371 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2640 mm |