2010 Porsche Cayenne vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Porsche Cayenne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Porsche Cayenne would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Porsche Cayenne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Porsche Cayenne (385 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (266 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Porsche Cayenne should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Porsche Cayenne weights approximately 340 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Porsche Cayenne (500 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 2010 Porsche Cayenne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2010 Porsche Cayenne 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Porsche Cadillac
Model Cayenne CTS
Year Released 2010 2013
Body Type SUV Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4800 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 385 HP 266 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 500 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 5700 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2245 kg 1905 kg
Vehicle Length 4798 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1699 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 2855 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 12.4 L/100km 9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 18.1 L/100km 13 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 68 L