2010 Renault Clio vs. 2001 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lincoln LS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lincoln LS weights approximately 512 kg more than 2010 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lincoln LS (278 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2001 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio. 2001 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 2010 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2010 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Renault Clio | 2001 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Renault | Lincoln |
Model | Clio | LS |
Year Released | 2010 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1460 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 278 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80.5 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.4 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |