2010 Renault Fluence vs. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Renault Fluence. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Renault Fluence would be higher. At 2,360 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander (166 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2010 Renault Fluence. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Fluence. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 310 kg more than 2010 Renault Fluence. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Fluence. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Renault Fluence | 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Renault | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fluence | Outlander |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1500 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 166 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4618 mm | 4665 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1809 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1478 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2702 mm | 2670 mm |