2010 Saab 03-Sep vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Saab 03-Sep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Saab 03-Sep would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (156 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2010 Saab 03-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saab 03-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saab 03-Sep (299 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Toyota Matrix. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Saab 03-Sep | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Saab | Toyota |
Model | 03-Sep | Matrix |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 299 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4689 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1801 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1529 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2675 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |