2010 Smart ForTwo vs. 1969 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 820 kg more than 2010 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Smart ForTwo | 1969 Pontiac Firebird | |
| Make | Smart | Pontiac |
| Model | ForTwo | Firebird |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1000 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2695 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1542 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1867 mm | 2750 mm |
