2010 SSC Ultimate Aero vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero (1,269 HP @ 6075 RPM) has 727 more horse power than 2013 Jaguar XK. (542 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero should accelerate faster than 2013 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XK weights approximately 600 kg more than 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | SSC | Jaguar |
| Model | Ultimate Aero | XK |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6350 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 1269 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6075 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 437 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 2.8 seconds | 4.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4794 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2080 mm | 2032 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1090 mm | 1322 mm |
