2010 Suzuki Equator vs. 1977 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 150 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Datsun 280Z weights approximately 329 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Datsun 280Z (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Suzuki Equator. (171 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1977 Datsun 280Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Suzuki Equator. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 1977 Datsun 280Z has manual transmission. 1977 Datsun 280Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Suzuki Equator | 1977 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Suzuki | Datsun |
Model | Equator | 280Z |
Year Released | 2010 | 1977 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |