2010 Suzuki Equator vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 310 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Suzuki Equator. (171 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2001 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Suzuki Equator. 2010 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 2001 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2001 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Suzuki Equator | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Suzuki | Nissan |
Model | Equator | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2010 | 2001 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 171 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |