2010 Suzuki Swift vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 5,935 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage has automatic transmission and 2010 Suzuki Swift has manual transmission. 2010 Suzuki Swift will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Suzuki Swift | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
| Make | Suzuki | Aston Martin |
| Model | Swift | Vantage |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1400 cc | 5935 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4382 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1695 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2600 mm |
