2010 Tata Nano vs. 2005 Daewoo Rexton
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Daewoo Rexton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Daewoo Rexton would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Rexton (215 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rexton should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Rexton weights approximately 1350 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Daewoo Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Daewoo Rexton (318 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Daewoo Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano. 2005 Daewoo Rexton has automatic transmission and 2010 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2010 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Daewoo Rexton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Tata Nano | 2005 Daewoo Rexton | |
| Make | Tata | Daewoo |
| Model | Nano | Rexton |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 624 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 48 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.5 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2830 mm |
