2010 Tata Nano vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Holden Cruze. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Holden Cruze would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano.
Because 2010 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Tata Nano | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Tata | Holden |
| Model | Nano | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 624 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 48 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3099 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1495 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1652 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2685 mm |
