2010 Tata Nano vs. 2012 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Tata Nano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Tata Nano would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (180 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano.
Because 2012 Saab 03-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Tata Nano | 2012 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Tata | Saab |
| Model | Nano | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 624 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 48 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73.5 mm | 90.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.5 mm | 82 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 58 L |
