2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Acura Integra would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (260 HP) has 147 more horse power than 1986 Acura Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1986 Acura Integra.
Because 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser | 1986 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Toyota | Acura |
| Model | FJ Cruiser | Integra |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1986 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4671 mm | 4355 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1905 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1811 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2520 mm |
