2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser vs. 2004 Honda Integra
To start off, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda Integra would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser has automatic transmission and 2004 Honda Integra has manual transmission. 2004 Honda Integra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser | 2004 Honda Integra | |
Make | Toyota | Honda |
Model | FJ Cruiser | Integra |
Year Released | 2010 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4671 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1905 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1811 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |