2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser. (260 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser weights approximately 275 kg more than 2011 Kia Cadenza.
Because 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Toyota | Kia |
Model | FJ Cruiser | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2010 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 290 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4671 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1905 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1811 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2845 mm |