2010 Toyota Highlander vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2010 Toyota Highlander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Highlander (270 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (256 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75.
Because 2010 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Highlander (287 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Toyota Highlander | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Toyota | Rover |
Model | Highlander | 75 |
Year Released | 2010 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3300 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 287 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | AWD | Front |
Transmission Type | CVT | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4785 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2789 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |