2010 Toyota Matrix S vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix XRS
To start off, both 2010 Toyota Matrix S and 2010 Toyota Matrix XRS were released in the same year (2010). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. Both 2010 Toyota Matrix S and 2010 Toyota Matrix XRS are equipped with a 2,400 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 158 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix XRS weights approximately 34 kg more than 2010 Toyota Matrix S.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 219 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Toyota Matrix S | 2010 Toyota Matrix XRS | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | Matrix | Matrix |
Year Released | 2010 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2400 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 219 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1424 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4394 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1765 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1549 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2601 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |