2010 Toyota Matrix vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Toyota Matrix would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (71 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2013 Smart Fortwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 460 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 2010 Toyota Matrix has manual transmission. 2010 Toyota Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Toyota Matrix | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Toyota | Smart |
Model | Matrix | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4366 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1765 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1549 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2601 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.4 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 33 L |