2010 Toyota RAV4 vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2010 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota RAV4 (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota RAV4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota RAV4 (233 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota RAV4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Toyota RAV4 | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | RAV4 | 66 |
Year Released | 2010 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1816 mm | 1550 mm |