2010 Volvo C30 vs. 1975 Chrysler Centura
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Chrysler Centura. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Chrysler Centura would be higher. At 1,981 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Chrysler Centura is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1975 Chrysler Centura.
Because 1975 Chrysler Centura is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Chrysler Centura. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1975 Chrysler Centura has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Chrysler Centura will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Volvo C30 | 1975 Chrysler Centura | |
| Make | Volvo | Chrysler |
| Model | C30 | Centura |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4252 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1783 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1448 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2680 mm |
