2010 Volvo C30 vs. 1998 Kia Capital
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Capital. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Capital would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 126 kg more than 1998 Kia Capital.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Capital. (152 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Capital. 1998 Kia Capital has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Kia Capital will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Volvo C30 | 1998 Kia Capital | |
Make | Volvo | Kia |
Model | C30 | Capital |
Year Released | 2010 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 152 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4252 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1783 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1448 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2530 mm |