2010 Volvo C30 vs. 2002 Holden Vectra
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Holden Vectra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Holden Vectra would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Holden Vectra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Vectra weights approximately 79 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Holden Vectra has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Holden Vectra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Volvo C30 | 2002 Holden Vectra | |
Make | Volvo | Holden |
Model | C30 | Vectra |
Year Released | 2010 | 2002 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4252 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1783 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1448 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2710 mm |