2010 Volvo C30 vs. 2012 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2012 GMC Canyon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Volvo C30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Volvo C30 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 GMC Canyon weights approximately 1027 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 2012 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 GMC Canyon. (259 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Volvo C30 | 2012 GMC Canyon | |
| Make | Volvo | GMC |
| Model | C30 | Canyon |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 259 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 2478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4252 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1783 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1448 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |
