2010 Volvo C30 vs. 2012 Kia Optima
To start off, 2012 Kia Optima is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Volvo C30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Volvo C30 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Optima weights approximately 11 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Kia Optima has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Kia Optima will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Volvo C30 | 2012 Kia Optima | |
Make | Volvo | Kia |
Model | C30 | Optima |
Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1462 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4252 mm | 4844 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1783 mm | 1831 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1448 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2797 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |