2010 Volvo S40 vs. 2012 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Volvo S40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Volvo S40 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S40 (227 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot 508. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot 508.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 2012 Peugeot 508 has manual transmission. 2012 Peugeot 508 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Volvo S40 | 2012 Peugeot 508 | |
| Make | Volvo | Peugeot |
| Model | S40 | 508 |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 161 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4475 mm | 4823 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1864 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1453 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2639 mm | 2815 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
