2010 Volvo S80 vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Volvo S80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Volvo S80 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S80 (311 HP) has 243 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2010 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Volvo S80 has automatic transmission and 2012 Nissan Pixo has manual transmission. 2012 Nissan Pixo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo S80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Volvo S80 | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Volvo | Nissan |
| Model | S80 | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4851 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1862 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1494 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2835 mm | 2360 mm |
