2010 Volvo S80 vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Volvo S80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Volvo S80 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2010 Volvo S80. (311 HP @ 5950 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo S80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 842 kg more than 2010 Volvo S80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo S80. (440 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo S80.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Volvo S80 | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Volvo | Toyota |
| Model | S80 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 2010 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 311 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5950 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1879 kg | 2721 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4851 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1862 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1494 mm | 1955 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2835 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 17.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |
