2010 Volvo V50 vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2010 Volvo V50 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo V50 weights approximately 428 kg more than 2002 Nissan Bluebird.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 2010 Volvo V50 has manual transmission. 2010 Volvo V50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2010 Volvo V50 | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Volvo | Nissan |
Model | V50 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2010 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | AWD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4521 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1473 mm | 1450 mm |