2010 Volvo XC60 vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC60 (281 HP) has 182 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 483 kg more than 1986 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2010 Volvo XC60 | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Volvo | Ford |
| Model | XC60 | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 2010 | 1986 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 281 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | AWD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1893 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4628 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1712 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2774 mm | 3030 mm |
