2011 Alfa Romeo 159 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Alfa Romeo 159. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Alfa Romeo 159 would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Alfa Romeo 159 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Alfa Romeo 159 weights approximately 397 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 2011 Alfa Romeo 159 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Alfa Romeo 159 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Alfa Romeo 159. (322 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Alfa Romeo 159.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Alfa Romeo 159 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 159 | C30 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 322 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1848 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |