2011 Alpina B7 vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Alpina B7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Alpina B7 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Alpina B7 (500 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2012 Ford F-250. (385 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Alpina B7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Alpina B7 (699 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford F-250. (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Alpina B7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Alpina B7 | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | B7 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 699 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5225 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1902 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1494 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3211 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 132 L |