2011 Audi A6 vs. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2011 Audi A6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 SsangYong Chairman W would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A6 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. (222 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W.
Because 2011 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi A6 (440 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. (296 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2011 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Audi A6 | 2010 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Audi | SsangYong |
Model | A6 | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4200 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 222 HP |
Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 296 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4934 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1862 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1519 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2833 mm | 2970 mm |