2011 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Audi A6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2011 Audi A6. (300 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 10 kg more than 2011 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are all wheel drive (AWD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (625 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Audi A6. (420 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Audi A6 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A6 | XJ |
Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 625 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4928 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1854 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1458 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2842 mm | 3157 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.9 L/100km |