2011 BMW M3 vs. 2012 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2012 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Lincoln MKZ weights approximately 47 kg more than 2011 BMW M3.
Because 2011 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Lincoln MKZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 BMW M3 | 2012 Lincoln MKZ | |
| Make | BMW | Lincoln |
| Model | M3 | MKZ |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3999 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 414 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1702 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4615 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1803 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2761 mm | 2728 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.3 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 17.7 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 66 L |
