2011 BMW X5 vs. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE
To start off, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 BMW X5 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2011 BMW X5. (300 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE should accelerate faster than 2011 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 BMW X5 weights approximately 370 kg more than 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE.
Both vehicles are all wheel drive (AWD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 BMW X5. (406 Nm @ 1200 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 BMW X5 | 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | X5 | F-TYPE |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 375 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 406 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | AWD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2250 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4857 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1933 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1776 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2934 mm | 2909 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
