2011 Chevrolet Epica vs. 2000 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. (118 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Epica weights approximately 385 kg more than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Epica (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. 2011 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 has manual transmission. 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Chevrolet Epica | 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Epica | 146 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2490 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 82.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.2 mm | 75.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 51 L |
