2011 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2003 Volvo C70. (160 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 314 kg more than 2003 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Volvo C70. (230 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Chevrolet Equinox | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Equinox | C70 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2400 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6700 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1714 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2858 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 68 L |
