2011 Chrysler 200 vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2010 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2010 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chrysler 200 (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Chrysler 200 | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 200 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2011 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 352 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4948 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1842 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1471 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2766 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 62 L |