2011 Chrysler Ypsilon vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 2011 Chrysler Ypsilon is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (146 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2011 Chrysler Ypsilon. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chrysler Ypsilon.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler Ypsilon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Volvo 260 has automatic transmission and 2011 Chrysler Ypsilon has manual transmission. 2011 Chrysler Ypsilon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Volvo 260 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Chrysler Ypsilon | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Ypsilon | 260 |
Year Released | 2011 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1248 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 146 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2660 mm |