2011 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Daewoo Rezzo (103 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Daewoo Rezzo | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Daewoo | Nissan |
| Model | Rezzo | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 167 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.5 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2360 mm |
