2011 Fisker Karma vs. 2006 BMW Z4
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW Z4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1215 kg more than 2006 BMW Z4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Fisker Karma | 2006 BMW Z4 | |
| Make | Fisker | BMW |
| Model | Karma | Z4 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2540 kg | 1325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4996 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1984 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1331 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 55 L |
