2011 Fisker Karma vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Fisker Karma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Fisker Karma would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1006 kg more than 2013 Ford Transit Connect.
Because 2011 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Fisker Karma | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
| Make | Fisker | Ford |
| Model | Karma | Transit Connect |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Single Speed | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2540 kg | 1534 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4996 mm | 4587 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1984 mm | 2113 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1331 mm | 2014 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 58 L |
