2011 Ford E-150 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-09
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-09 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2011 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2011 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-09 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2011 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-150 weights approximately 549 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-09.
Because 2011 Ford E-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford E-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-09, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-150 (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-09. (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2011 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-09.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Ford E-150 | 2013 Mazda CX-09 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | E-150 | CX-09 |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 3726 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 387 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2611 kg | 2062 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5504 mm | 5108 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2017 mm | 1936 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2085 mm | 1728 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3505 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 12.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 125 L | 76 L |
