2011 Ford Ecosport vs. 2006 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Chevrolet Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Chevrolet Epica would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2006 Chevrolet Epica. (142 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 2006 Chevrolet Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 2011 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2011 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2011 Ford Ecosport | 2006 Chevrolet Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Ecosport | Epica |
| Year Released | 2011 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 142 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4228 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2710 mm |
