2011 Ford F-250 vs. 1988 Acura Integra
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Acura Integra would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1988 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1988 Acura Integra.
Because 2011 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Ford F-250 | 1988 Acura Integra | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | F-250 | Integra |
Year Released | 2011 | 1988 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6200 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 548 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1966 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2520 mm |