2011 Ford F-250 vs. 1994 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1994 Holden Commodore. (173 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1994 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Holden Commodore. (295 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2011 Ford F-250 | 1994 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | F-250 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2011 | 1994 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6200 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 385 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 548 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Flex Fuel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 6269 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2029 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1966 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3967 mm | 2740 mm |